Those with the highest disease burden saved the state more by using alternative medicine, costing "an average of $1,420 less annually."
I think it is fair to say that really smart researchers who don't know what they are doing can really come to the wrong conclusion. You missed the forest for the trees, boys. Now go down and apologize to that nice Amish grandma
Since Dr. Oz does not endorse products, seeing his face plastered over any product is a sure sign that the product is NOT to be trusted.
Fans win hands down, because they really don't lower fuel economy.
But it doesn't make women fat (collective sigh). Instead, it makes women dead.
The internet provides us with so much information, but sometimes the information we need the most is missing.
I think when things were a toss up back in 2001 everybody decided oil was easier and cost about the same. Now I want to see recent numbers that would justify using oil.
The report mentions that there is a "battery of rigorous biological tests" which boil down to "can we kill a rat with this?"
doing something greener can also mean doing something cheaper.
all of you out there think I should give it a second chance. Take it as prescribed, for goodness sake. I did so, showing I think formidable bravery in the face of severe flatulence