Posted by: Chris Maloney | February 12, 2014

Should You Get A Mammogram?

If you have lived in the U.S. in the last few decades, the answer from every area of modern health has been yes.  Mammograms detect breast cancer, and that leads to earlier treatment and less death.  It’s a simple equation: more testing = more detection= less death.  Too bad it’s all wrong.

Let’s be clear. The study they just published on mammograms is the end of the test.  There will be a lot of hand waving, and it’s likely that docs will fight it, but in the end, it’s really hard to argue with numbers.

Here’s the study link. The study was large: over 89,000 women.  It was long: over twenty-five years of follow-up.  And it was definitive: mammograms do not prevent death from cancer.  If you look at the equation above, that was the point of mammograms. It wasn’t the detection of breast cancer, it was the prevention of death.

But, the argument will go, we might detect breast cancer earlier for this specific person.  Even though mammograms do not prevent cancer overall, there might be a reason to use a mammogram in this family or with these patients.  We still might detect more cancers in certain subgroups of women and save lives that way.

Well, that wasn’t what the study found. In fact, mammograms resulted in 22% false positives, leading to unnecessary treatments. So while certain women might benefit from mammograms, we have to balance that against the very real one in five chance that the cancer detected was a false positive that resulted in unnecessary surgery and other treatments.

A huge amount of money (37 million tests a year at $100 each) and professional prestige has gone into the promotion of mammograms.  But earlier studies showing some benefit did not use gold standard randomization, and failed to account for the increased use of drugs like Tamoxifen, which makes early detection less necessary (this from the NYT  article).  So unless someone else has another twenty-five year study handy, this one should make mammograms an optional rather than a mandatory medical test. Mind you, it won’t come without a fight from every major medical group that has promoted the test for decades.

But someone who isn’t invested in the system might ask whether our focus on unnecessary testing in prostate cancer and now in breast cancer has hindered our efforts to make really positive changes in our lives.  How many people just get tested rather than start doing things to help themselves avoid the illness? If we could use all the money spent on mammograms to get women walking, wouldn’t that have been money better spent?



  1. I attended a seminar about holistic approach to cancer treatment and one thing I realized is that prevention is really better than cure. We shouldn’t even put ourselves in a position where we will be exposed to avoidable risk factors of diseases. I agree with you 100% on that, however, I think that people should LEARN how to check themselves and have a professional check them once in a while. I appreciate this eye-opening article!

  2. Absolutely! I would love to see everyone getting the “three depths” of breast cancer check training. A good breast exam by a professional should be several minutes per breast. I think the take-home message from both the mammogram and the prostate cancer screenings is that we cannot relegate our personal health to a screening test. Most patients I’ve talked to have known something was wrong well before testing confirmed it.

    Thanks for your comment!

Tell me what you think!

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: