One of the major reasons given for not covering alternative medicine under insurance plans is that it would cost more money to cover those services. The model is a simple one: more coverage equals more usage equals higher costs.
But with the healthcare model adding alternative medicine something strange happens. People take better care of themselves. They use outpatient services rather than inpatient services. When asked, they have significantly better self-reported health.
And, surprisingly, they cost less. That’s right, we add more services and healthcare costs go down. So why aren’t we adding alternative medicine everywhere? Why isn’t it a major part of the healthcare discussion?
Here’s the study:
The association of complementary and alternative medicine use and health care expenditures for back and neck problems.
Health care costs associated with use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) by patients with spine problems have not been studied in a national sample.
To estimate the total and spine-specific medical expenditures among CAM and non-CAM users with spine problems.
Analysis of the 2002-2008 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey.
Adults (above 17 y) with self-reported neck and back problems who did or did not use CAM services.
Survey-weighted generalized linear regression and propensity matching to examine expenditure differences between CAM users and non-CAM users while controlling for patient, socioeconomic, and health characteristics.
A total of 12,036 respondents with spine problems were included, including 4306 (35.8%) CAM users (40.8% in weighted sample). CAM users had significantly better self-reported health, education, and comorbidity compared with non-CAM users. Adjusted annual medical costs among CAM users was $424 lower (95% confidence interval: $240, $609; P<0.001) for spine-related costs, and $796 lower (95% confidence interval: $121, $1470; P = 0.021) for total health care cost than among non-CAM users. Average expenditure for CAM users, based on propensity matching, was $526 lower for spine-specific costs (P<0.001) and $298 lower for total health costs (P = 0.403). Expenditure differences were primarily due to lower inpatient expenditures among CAM users.
CAM users did not add to the overall medical spending in a nationally representative sample with neck and back problems. As the causal associations remain unclear in these cross-sectional data, future research exploring these cost differences might benefit from research designs that minimize confounding.
- PMID: 23132198
- “Mainstream” Doctors and Nurses Often Use Alternative Medicine for Themselves (consciouslifenews.com)
- The Great Debate Between Western And Alternative Medicine (medcitynews.com)
- Why we need to research the use of complementary medicine (guardian.co.uk)
- Use Of Complementary And Alternative Medicines And Supplements By Mexican-Origin Patients In HIV Clinic (medicalnewstoday.com)
- New alternative medicine laws (sott.net)
- Alternative Medicine Use Common In Kids With Chronic Conditions: Study (huffingtonpost.com)
- Benefits of Elderberries (reflectionswithrhonda.com)
- Complementary And Alternative Medicine Studied In Swedish Surgical Care (medicalnewstoday.com)
- T-391 days October 22, 2012-Meet the Alternative Medicine Doctor (cancerchica.wordpress.com)
- 16. “Mainstream” Doctors and Nurses Often Use Alternative Medicine for Themselves (12160.info)